Understanding Excipient Grades: What You Need to Know

Originally published at https://www.chemintel360.com/. Get our excipient business reports at https://chemintel360.com/product-category/excipients/, and our drug patent reports at https://chemintel360.com/product-category/drug-patent-reports/
Image 10

Excipients, the inactive ingredients in pharmaceutical formulations, play a crucial role in drug manufacturing and delivery. While often overlooked, their quality and grade can significantly impact a drug product’s critical quality attributes, such as stability, bioavailability, and efficacy. As the pharmaceutical industry navigates an increasingly complex supply chain landscape, understanding excipient grades has become paramount.

The Importance of Excipient Grades

“Excipients may be inactive, but they are far from inert,” says Nigel Langley, Chair of IPEC-Americas. “They can influence drug product performance, stability, and even patient safety. That’s why selecting the appropriate excipient grade is crucial.”[1][2]

Excipient grades are classifications based on the material’s intended use and the level of quality control applied during its production. The highest grade, known as the compendial or pharmaceutical grade, meets the stringent standards set by pharmacopeias like the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) and the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph.Eur).

“Without proper verification, full traceability, and GMP, material grades meeting only chemical or industrial standards may risk patient harm if used in drug manufacturing.”[1]

Navigating the Grades

The USP classifies excipients based on their suitability as ingredients in finished dosage forms (FDFs) versus manufacturing intermediates. Raw materials used exclusively in formulating active drug substances are considered one grade, while those added during processing and potentially remaining in trace amounts in the FDF are another.[1]

Pharmacopeial monographs provide quality expectations for each material, including identity, strength, purity, and performance criteria, as well as tests to validate these attributes. Excipients are assigned functional categories based on their role in the formulation, such as binders, disintegrants, or lubricants.[3]

“Chapter <1059> Excipient Performance provides an overview of the key functional categories and suggested test methods to monitor and control critical material attributes,” explains David Schoneker, Executive Committee Member and QbD/Composition Committee Chair at IPEC-Americas.[1]

Global Regulatory Landscape

While regulations for excipient grades vary worldwide, most countries govern their use through pharmacopeial standards. In the United States, the USP requires official substances to be manufactured according to current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) and from ingredients complying with specifications designed to meet compendial monographs.[1]

“For U.S. drug approvals, the compendial grade denotes meeting pharmacopeia monograph specifications and cGMP – the highest material benchmark,” says Priscilla Zawislak, President of the IPEC Federation.[1]

In situations where multiple pharmacopeias are in place, a material meeting all standards is designated as multi-compendial grade, facilitating international trade. However, when no specific standard exists, supply grade materials must still ensure traceability and quality protocols, though data may be less comprehensive.[1]

Supplier Qualification and Risk Mitigation

As the risk of economically motivated adulteration increases, even for common excipients, supplier qualification becomes crucial for material quality and safety. “Cost pressures have led some manufacturers to use inappropriate material suppliers, such as chemical, industrial, or food grades, where no mandated production monitoring or GMP exists,” warns Joseph Zeleznik, Executive Committee Member at IPEC-Americas.[1][2]

To mitigate risks, pharmaceutical companies must implement robust supplier qualification programs, including audits, material testing, and supply chain traceability. Initiatives like the EXCiPACT certification scheme provide an additional layer of assurance by evaluating excipient manufacturers’ quality systems.[4]


In the era of Quality by Design (QbD) and heightened regulatory scrutiny, understanding excipient grades is no longer optional – it’s a necessity. By selecting the appropriate grade, implementing rigorous testing protocols, and qualifying suppliers, pharmaceutical companies can ensure consistent excipient performance, mitigate risks, and ultimately, safeguard patient safety.

[1] https://www.pharmaceuticalonline.com/doc/navigating-grades-and-sources-of-materials-in-drug-manufacturing-0001
[2] https://www.pharmtech.com/view/drug-digest-making-the-grade-the-importance-of-using-the-correct-excipient-grade-in-drug-products
[3] https://www.americanpharmaceuticalreview.com/Featured-Articles/37322-Compendial-Standards-and-Excipient-Performance-in-the-QbD-Era-USP-Excipient-Performance-Chapter-1059/
[4] https://www.biopharminternational.com/view/case-study-pharmacopoeia-compliance-excipients-and-raw-materials-0
[5] https://www.europeanpharmaceuticalreview.com/article/98178/allowable-levels-of-excipients-in-drug-products/

Scroll to Top